TasTheStuff review for Original Toothpaste

This isn’t like my usual content of reviewing a Korean skincare product, but rather a slightly odd one—I was quite intrigued by Euthymol’s Original Toothpaste. I’ve only ever used Crest toothpaste since I was a kid, so trying this felt like a leap of faith. I’m not disappointed with the results, but I do have concerns about using a fluoride-free toothpaste, at least for me. There's enough evidence showing that going fluoride-free may cause teeth to develop thinner enamel and reduce their ability to remineralize early signs of decay—something I want to avoid. Nonetheless, I gave it a try. Please note, this will be a LONG read. A bit of background on Euthymol’s Original Toothpaste: - Fluoride-free toothpaste that contains antiseptic ingredients - Contains 106 grams/3.7 oz - Purpose: to remove plaque and keep breath fresh Here are some of the reasons why I rate this 2/5: 🦷 I cannot use fluoride-free toothpaste, and I’m somewhat against it. As someone with a medical background, there hasn’t been enough evidence to show that fluoride-free is a better option. In fact, I’d argue it’s worse. 🦷 I believe going fluoride-free weakens enamel. Now, I do understand this formulation might be better for those who experience mouth ulcers or pimples from fluoride use, so if you’re sensitive to fluoride, only then I’d recommend it for you. 🦷 Upon using it, I noticed a slight sting initially that lasted for a while. It did not go away quickly after rinsing my mouth. I also noticed that this kind of destroys your taste buds for a while (around half an hour), so don’t eat right away after brushing. 🦷 This product claims to provide cavity protection. Without fluoride, I question this claim, so I checked the ingredients for alternatives that might back it up. The ingredient list is simple, but I found hydrated silica, which is a mildly abrasive ingredient that removes plaque without damaging teeth. However, it doesn’t necessarily prevent cavities or help with decay, so I’m unsure what’s supporting this claim. 🦷 Another ingredient I thought might contribute to cavity protection is Tocopheryl Acetate, but based on medical research, there’s insufficient evidence that it works as well as fluoride. I couldn’t find proof that it’s a reliable cavity-protecting ingredient. 🦷 The previous formulation included Thymol as an antiseptic, but it’s been removed. So, I’m not sure what, if anything, adds extra protection now. 🦷 Here’s a comprehensive list of the ingredients and their functions. While some are beneficial, it proves my point that this toothpaste doesn’t offer the long-term benefits that well-established brands do: - Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate: Abrasive that helps clean teeth; calcium and phosphate ions aid in remineralization. - Aqua: Water - Sorbitol: Moisture-retaining sugar substitute - Glycerin: Moisturizing agent - Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: Cleansing agent that creates foam - Hydrated Silica: Abrasive for plaque removal - Titanium Dioxide: White coloring agent - Carrageenan & Cellulose Gum: Thickening agents - Sodium Saccharin: Artificial sweetener - Sorbitan Oleate: Emulsifier - Tocopheryl Acetate: Antioxidant to reduce plaque (though lacking evidence for cavity protection) - Red 33 and Yellow 3: Coloring agents for the pink hue Overall, based on several dental cases of patients using Euthymol and experiencing dental caries, along with no scientific backing that it works as well as fluoride-based toothpaste, I’ll have to pass on this. I’ll use it as a breath freshener, but I won’t rely on it to protect my teeth. I give it a 2/5.